Global.Warming...or.a.lot.of.Hot.Air.HDTV.XviD-BiLDeRBeRG
- Type:
- Video > TV shows
- Files:
- 2
- Size:
- 337.9 MB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- Global Warming AGW Climategate Fraud
- Quality:
- +1 / -2 (-1)
- Uploaded:
- Jan 3, 2010
- By:
- k3nd00d
Video: Xvid 640x360 29.97fps 973Kbps Audio: MPEG Audio Layer 3 44100Hz stereo 96Kbps Fox News Reporting: Global Warming ... or a Lot of Hot Air? Sunday, December 20, 2009 at 9 p.m. ET Hosted by Bret Baier The global warming debate appears as polarized as you can get: One side fears environmental ruin unless we quickly cut carbon emissions even if that severely disrupts our way of life. The other predicts economic ruin from trillion-dollar plans to re-order the global economy and redistribute the world's wealth. As world leaders gathered at the Copenhagen conference on climate change, the controversy grew even hotter: Leaked e-mails cast doubt on the integrity of leading scientists; a cap-and-trade bill stalled in the Senate, and the Obama administration threatened an end-run around Congress. Fox News unpacks this complicated, but hugely important story. It includes interviews with top United Nations climate officials, researchers who upset the global warming consensus and the U.S. lawmakers fighting it out on Capitol Hill.
Of course, if it was from a left wing channel...then it would be credible. People like you, Hhiiimmmm, are a disease.
LOL Lysergic, that was great.
Note how so much of the supposed settled AGW science has now been proven to not be science but based on WWF propaganda, hiking magazine articles, telephone interview statements known to be spurious, student papers and intentionally fudged math. If you want to know these details, let me know. I know a web radio show that has covered the MSM news coverage about this coming from the top UK online newspapers...or search for yourself.
I suspect new AGW counter propaganda videos on you-tube likely have been covering this too. Not like you can expect our US controlled media to cover it and with honesty. Even the GOP news channel (fox) is not adequately doing so. But then its owner (Rupert Murdoch) also owns AGW theory fraud friendly media in other countries (making fox what is known as "controlled opposition").
I suspect new AGW counter propaganda videos on you-tube likely have been covering this too. Not like you can expect our US controlled media to cover it and with honesty. Even the GOP news channel (fox) is not adequately doing so. But then its owner (Rupert Murdoch) also owns AGW theory fraud friendly media in other countries (making fox what is known as "controlled opposition").
As I said on the other torrent, I am sad to see people conned into believing this obvious nonsense which is nothing to do with science but is pure, devious politics - I mean the misnamed 'scepticism' of AGW, of course.
People please stop reflexively googling the denialosphere for what to think, do some real research and you'll see the thousands (that's real thousands, not sceptic 'thousands') of papers and scientists in peer-reviewed journals forming an unarguable consensus.
If you take this time-out from the world of groupthinking, mutually-appreciating conspiracy believers, you'll see how evasive, inconsistent and self-contradictory these 'sceptics' really are. They regularly support theories/papers which totally contradict those they held As I said on the other torrent, I am sad to see people conned into believing this obvious nonsense which is nothing to do with science but is pure, devious politics - I mean the misnamed 'scepticism' of AGW, of course.
People please stop reflexively googling the denialosphere for what to think, do some real research and you'll see the thousands (that's real thousands, not sceptic 'thousands') of papers and scientists in peer-reviewed journals forming an unarguable consensus.
If you take this time-out from the world of groupthinking, mutually-appreciating conspiracy believers, you'll see how evasive, inconsistent and self-contradictory these 'sceptics' really are. They regularly support theories/papers which totally contradict those they held last week, ffs, yet see no need to reconcile this - it's just all grist to the mill of doubt! Now I ask you - is that scientific? Is it even logical?!
'Sceptics', save yourself the humiliation some of you so enjoy inflicting on others - all the LOLing at the gullible on youtube is going to seem sadly ironic when the lid is blown, and that time is fast approaching - 2 glowingly reviewed books by respected authors already published that expose this real scandal in detail ('Merchants of Doubt' and 'Global Climate Change: A Primer')...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic-contradictions.html
People please stop reflexively googling the denialosphere for what to think, do some real research and you'll see the thousands (that's real thousands, not sceptic 'thousands') of papers and scientists in peer-reviewed journals forming an unarguable consensus.
If you take this time-out from the world of groupthinking, mutually-appreciating conspiracy believers, you'll see how evasive, inconsistent and self-contradictory these 'sceptics' really are. They regularly support theories/papers which totally contradict those they held As I said on the other torrent, I am sad to see people conned into believing this obvious nonsense which is nothing to do with science but is pure, devious politics - I mean the misnamed 'scepticism' of AGW, of course.
People please stop reflexively googling the denialosphere for what to think, do some real research and you'll see the thousands (that's real thousands, not sceptic 'thousands') of papers and scientists in peer-reviewed journals forming an unarguable consensus.
If you take this time-out from the world of groupthinking, mutually-appreciating conspiracy believers, you'll see how evasive, inconsistent and self-contradictory these 'sceptics' really are. They regularly support theories/papers which totally contradict those they held last week, ffs, yet see no need to reconcile this - it's just all grist to the mill of doubt! Now I ask you - is that scientific? Is it even logical?!
'Sceptics', save yourself the humiliation some of you so enjoy inflicting on others - all the LOLing at the gullible on youtube is going to seem sadly ironic when the lid is blown, and that time is fast approaching - 2 glowingly reviewed books by respected authors already published that expose this real scandal in detail ('Merchants of Doubt' and 'Global Climate Change: A Primer')...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic-contradictions.html
SORRY, IGNORE ^ ABOVE^!
As I said on the other torrent, I am sad to see people conned into believing this obvious nonsense which is nothing to do with science but is pure, devious politics - I mean the misnamed 'scepticism' of AGW, of course.
People please stop reflexively googling the denialosphere for what to think, do some real research and you'll see the thousands (that's real thousands, not sceptic 'thousands') of papers and scientists in peer-reviewed journals forming an unarguable consensus.
If you take this time-out from the world of groupthinking, mutually-appreciating conspiracy believers, you'll see how evasive, inconsistent and self-contradictory these 'sceptics' really are. They regularly support theories/papers which totally contradict those they held last week, ffs, yet see no need to reconcile this - it's just all grist to the mill of doubt! Now I ask you - is that scientific? Is it even logical?!
'Sceptics', save yourself the humiliation some of you so enjoy inflicting on others - all the LOLing at the gullible on youtube is going to seem sadly ironic when the lid is blown, and that time is fast approaching - 2 glowingly reviewed books by respected authors already published that expose this real scandal in detail ('Merchants of Doubt' and 'Global Climate Change: A Primer')...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic-contradictions.html
As I said on the other torrent, I am sad to see people conned into believing this obvious nonsense which is nothing to do with science but is pure, devious politics - I mean the misnamed 'scepticism' of AGW, of course.
People please stop reflexively googling the denialosphere for what to think, do some real research and you'll see the thousands (that's real thousands, not sceptic 'thousands') of papers and scientists in peer-reviewed journals forming an unarguable consensus.
If you take this time-out from the world of groupthinking, mutually-appreciating conspiracy believers, you'll see how evasive, inconsistent and self-contradictory these 'sceptics' really are. They regularly support theories/papers which totally contradict those they held last week, ffs, yet see no need to reconcile this - it's just all grist to the mill of doubt! Now I ask you - is that scientific? Is it even logical?!
'Sceptics', save yourself the humiliation some of you so enjoy inflicting on others - all the LOLing at the gullible on youtube is going to seem sadly ironic when the lid is blown, and that time is fast approaching - 2 glowingly reviewed books by respected authors already published that expose this real scandal in detail ('Merchants of Doubt' and 'Global Climate Change: A Primer')...
http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic-contradictions.html
Comments